Introduction

SILO is an acronym for Scientifically Integrated Learning Outcomes. It is also a play on words because education as a sector has often been criticised for teaching in silos where subjects are taught in isolation to each other. Historically, this has largely been the result of the institutional nature of education where students physically move from one class to the next. The SILO project takes a different approach by integrating the learning outcomes within the existing Australian Curriculum and NSW Syllabus which relate to STEM.


Research aims

There are two aims of the SILO project as follows:

  1. To articulate a scope and sequence for primary STEM education.
  2. To develop 28 integrated STEM units and continue to refine them through implementation in primary school classrooms.

The two research aims are further developed in Figure 1.1.

Figure 1.1

Research Aims


Research questions

Although the SILO project attempts to address the international focus on improving STEM education, it also seeks to address translation of research which is about bridging the gap between theory and practice. The two research questions are depicted in Figure 1.2.

Figure 1.2

Research Questions


Contact details and media

The chief investigator for the SILO project is Associate Professor Brendan Jacobs, Head of Department STEM Education, University of New England. Brendan can be contacted via email at bjacobs7@une.edu.au.

The SILO project underwent significant development during a four-month collaboration between Brendan Jacobs and Solina Quinton. Some highlights from this collaboration are detailed in the following blog post written by Hannah Collett for the Faculty of Humanities, Arts, Social Sciences and Education at the University of New England (https://blog.une.edu.au/hasse/2024/08/26/for-the-love-of-stem/).


Ethics approval

The SILO project has ethics approval from the University of New England (HE22-058) and the NSW Department of Education (SERAP 2022071).


Differentiation: There is variability within people, groups, and contexts which is why many of the activities in the SILO project are open ended. For example, design activities are intrinsically open ended as students are free to work at their own level and can often exceed expectations when given challenging opportunities with appropriate support. Some other tasks use differentiation to vary the task according to individual needs and/or available resources. In such instances the following differentiation icon provides additional information for extension on a case-by-case basis.

differentiation


Risk assessments: The activities and experiments in the SILO project are not considered to be high risk. Whenever there are safety considerations due to working with sharp objects, water, soil, chemicals, mains electricity, or moving objects, risk assessment documentation provides additional information linked to the following icon on a case-by-case basis.

None of the risk assessment information is contrary to common sense or basic duty of care.


  Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Main menu